Astra Sharma vs Rachel Smilansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Sharma 1 - 0 Smilansky

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sharma has won 49.54% of points on their second serve, while Smilansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sharma, in recent form, has won 50.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Smilansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Sharma has saved 59.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smilansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Sharma has won 56% of matches played (W/L 28/ 22), with Smilansky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Sharma has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 85/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Smilansky has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
• Player level: In the last year, Sharma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 12), where as Smilansky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sharma winning 1 times and Smilansky being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sharma winning 2 and Smilansky winning 0. The last match between Sharma and Smilansky was at the Landisville, 04-08-2014, Q1 round, Hard with Astra Sharma getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Sharma and Smilansky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sharma winning 0 times and Smilansky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sharma winning 0, and Smilansky 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sharma has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.92 while Smilansky has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sharma has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smilansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Sharma has converted 37.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smilansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)